iridescent anthurium Anthurium crystallinum 'Crystal Hope' – Iridescent Veins Hybrid
SKU: 60570815693
iridescent anthurium

iridescent anthurium Anthurium crystallinum 'Crystal Hope' – Iridescent Veins Hybrid

Sale price$18.52 Regular price$20.58
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $5.14 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 3 - Jul 8

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

iridescent anthurium Anthurium crystallinum 'Crystal Hope' – Iridescent Veins HybridAnthurium crystallinum Crystal Hope Compact growth, dark velvet leaves and bright white venation define Anthurium crystallinum Crystal Hope. The leaves face outward from the crown, so the pale veins remain easy to see even while the plant stays relatively neat in a pot. The plant pairs outward facing leaves and pale venation with thick epiphytic roots that need an airy pot setup. Its crown presents the leaves outward and keeps the plant tighter than

Anthurium crystallinum ‘Crystal Hope’

Compact growth, dark velvet leaves and bright white venation define Anthurium crystallinum ‘Crystal Hope’. The leaves face outward from the crown, so the pale veins remain easy to see even while the plant stays relatively neat in a pot.

The plant pairs outward-facing leaves and pale venation with thick epiphytic roots that need an airy pot setup. Its crown presents the leaves outward and keeps the plant tighter than many large velvet Anthuriums.

Defining features of Anthurium crystallinum ‘Crystal Hope’

  • Compact habit: The cultivar stays tighter than many larger crystallinum-type plants.
  • Outward-facing leaves: The blades are held so the vein pattern is visible from the front and sides.
  • Dark green surface: Mature leaves harden to a deep green, velvety finish.
  • Crystalline white veins: Pale veins create a sharp contrast across the cordate blades.
  • Thick epiphytic roots: The root system needs oxygen around the pot rather than dense, wet soil.

Growth in a compact pot

Anthurium crystallinum ‘Crystal Hope’ forms a tidy crown with leaves that expand outward from the centre. A close-fitting pot helps the root zone dry at a sensible pace, while a chunky substrate keeps moisture moving around the thick roots.

New leaves are soft while expanding and can mark or crease if the air is very dry. Once hardened, the blade becomes darker and the vein pattern looks clearer, especially in bright filtered light.

Care for Anthurium crystallinum ‘Crystal Hope’

  • Light: Give bright indirect light. Strong direct sun can scorch velvet leaves, especially while they are still soft.
  • Water: Water evenly, then allow the upper part of the substrate to dry slightly before the next watering.
  • Substrate: Use a chunky mix with bark, coco chips, perlite and a small moisture-retentive fraction. The roots should never sit in compacted soil.
  • Humidity: Around 60–75% humidity helps the leaves expand without sticking or creasing.
  • Temperature: Keep it warm, ideally 20–27 °C, with no cold draughts around the pot.
  • Repotting: Move up only when the root system needs space. Oversized pots can stay wet too long around the lower roots.

Issues on Anthurium crystallinum ‘Crystal Hope’

  • Smaller new leaves: Often follow root disturbance, low humidity or irregular watering during leaf expansion.
  • Brown margins: Dry air, mineral build-up or repeated drying can mark the fine leaf edge.
  • Root decline: Dense, old or collapsed substrate can stay wet and reduce oxygen around the roots.
  • Speckled new growth: Inspect new leaves for thrips or mites if fresh blades open with scars or pale marks.

Safety around Anthurium crystallinum ‘Crystal Hope’

Anthurium crystallinum ‘Crystal Hope’ contains calcium oxalate crystals and should be kept away from pets and small children. Chewing the plant can irritate the mouth and throat, and sap from damaged tissue can irritate skin or eyes.

Patent and botanical background

The genus name Anthurium comes from Greek words for flower and tail, referring to the spadix. Anthurium crystallinum Linden & André was published in 1873 and is accepted as a species native from Panama to Colombia. The Latin epithet crystallinum means crystal-like or resembling crystal. ‘Crystal Hope’ was patented in 1995 and described as a controlled cross between two crystallinum breeding selections, LV-36 and LV-40, developed in Cartago, Costa Rica by Claude Hope.

Dark velvet blades stay close to the crown, with white veins held clearly across each leaf.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 60570815693

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell iridescent anthurium

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 1161 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
A
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
A Case for Jesus' Divine Self-Conception
Format: Kindle
This is a very meticulously reasoned argument attempting to show that Jesus had a Divine self-conception. That is, Jesus believed, and claimed, that he was God. Pitre begins by posing C.S. Lewis’ famous “trilemma” to the reader. If Jesus claimed to be God, we have three ways to respond – he was either a Liar, Lunatic, or Lord. Pitre’s work in this book strives to bring us back, face to face, with this trilemma. To accomplish this, Pitre needs to defeat another popular notion in the modern mind – that Jesus, or at least much of the Gospel material about him, was a “Legend.” If Pitre can show that Jesus did, in fact, historically claim Divinity, we will be forced to respond to his claim and answer Jesus’ own question for ourselves – “Who do you say that I am?” To accomplish this Pitre first attempts to show that the Gospels are historically reliable. He believes that, contrary to modern scholarly opinion, the Gospels were indeed written by the authors they have been attributed to (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), that they were intended to portray historically accurate biographical pictures of Jesus, and that they were written much more closely to the time of Jesus than liberal scholars assume (Pitre tentatively dates the synoptic Gospels all before the destruction of the Temple in AD 70). These three pieces of evidence – authorship, intent, and dating – all lead Pitre to the conclusion that the Gospels give us historically accurate information about Jesus. After setting the stage by arguing for the accuracy of our sources, Pitre delves into the synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) and tries to show that although it is not always explicit (i.e. Jesus doesn’t say “I am God, worship Me.”) even the synoptics portray Jesus as claiming Divinity. Using evidence such as Jesus’ use of the titles “Son of Man” and “I Am,” prophesy from the book of Daniel, Jesus’ “stilling of the storm,” the transfiguration, the pronouncement of the forgiveness of the parlytic’s sins, the riddle about the Son of David being David’s “Lord,”, the crucifixion, and the resurrection, Pitre makes his case. In the end, he believes that not only do the Gospel authors portray Jesus as Divine, but that these claims came from Jesus himself. Thus we are led, full circle, back to the trilemma. We can call Jesus Liar, Lunatic, or Lord, but not, according to Pitre, a Legend. This was a really interesting read from a conservative scholar. His exegesis of many Gospel passages illuminate how the Hebrew Scriptures provide a much needed backdrop for understanding each story. The Gospels are much more nuanced than we might first think and oftentimes one saying or image may evoke whole passages or concepts from the Old Testament that would have been apparent to early Jewish readers. As Pitre argues, understanding the Jewish context of the synoptic authors helps in understanding their Christology. In the end, I agree with Pitre that the Gospels are generally more historically accurate than “mainstream” scholars give them credit for. I think it’s plausible that the Gospel titles reveal their true authors and that they were written fairly early after Jesus’ death (before the fall of Jerusalem). I also agree that the Synoptics may implicitly ascribe Divinity to Jesus – although I don’t think that is an open and shut case. If there were more explicit cases in the synoptic Gospels where Jesus claimed Divinity, it would help his case. It still seems to me the only explicit sayings we have come from the Gospel of John, which even Pitre doesn’t seem to argue is historically reliable (at least he doesn’t focus on this in the book). It’s probably outside the scope of this book, but I would have loved to see Pitre address the idea of Jesus as Apocalyptic Prophet. He interacts with several scholars who accept this notion (EP Sanders, Dale Allison, Bart Ehrman, John Meier) and it’s a viable option in the world of Historical Jesus scholarship. I think it’s a relevant topic in all discussions surrounding a Historical Jesus and can be a large factor in how one answers the question of Jesus’ identity. This study is worth reading regardless of your theological persuasion, and Pitre’s arguments deserve serious consideration.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2016
S
Verified Purchase
ShopWeez
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
Relief for dry mouth without gum irritation
Big improvement for users with sensitive gums. These relieve dry mouth during the night almost as well as the regular tabs. Some complained about a residual gel left on the gums. 🙄Just wipe it off. It’s a small thing.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2026
B
Verified Purchase
Bronx Mike
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
An easy fix for dry mouth
Excellent for dry mouth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
D
Verified Purchase
Discerning Buyer
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 1
This version doesn’t work
I used these 2 nights in a row. I was hoping Oracoat found a solution to the problem people like me have with the regular Xylimelts: irritation of gums. As others have noted the “sensitive” version doesn’t melt and the goo that remains can be difficult to remove. I didn’t have too much trouble after the first night. However, the second day after use, it was so hard to get the remains out, I wound up with a very sore spot from digging it out. I will toss the rest. It’s too bad this effort fizzled. I hope Oracoat will find a solution For sensitive mouths. In the b meantime, I will use the original for a few nights and then stop before repeating. The idea behind the original product is fantastic. Unfortunately this attempt to make it usable for people with sensitive mouths hasn’t worked. Please try again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2025
M
Verified Purchase
Masey
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
Helped with Dry Mouth
Followed the instructions on the box and everything turned out amazing! Absolutely love the results and relief I felt
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026

recommand products